Jumat, 30 Agustus 2013

Scientists grow "mini human brains" from stem cells




"By Kate Kelland, Health and Science Correspondent

LONDON (Reuters) - Scientists have grown the first mini human brains in a laboratory and say their success could lead to new levels of understanding about the way brains develop and what goes wrong in disorders like schizophrenia and autism.

Researchers based in Austria started with human stem cells and created a culture in the lab that allowed them to grow into so-called "cerebral organoids" - or mini brains - that consisted of several distinct brain regions.

It is the first time that scientists have managed to replicate the development of brain tissue in three dimensions.

Using the organoids, the scientists were then able to produce a biological model of how a rare brain condition called microcephaly develops - suggesting the same technique could in future be used to model disorders like autism or schizophrenia that affect millions of people around the world.

"This study offers the promise of a major new tool for understanding the causes of major developmental disorders of the brain ... as well as testing possible treatments," said Paul Matthews, a professor of clinical neuroscience at Imperial College London, who was not involved in the research but was impressed with its results.

Zameel Cader, a consultant neurologist at Britain's John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford, described the work as "fascinating and exciting". He said it extended the possibility of stem cell technologies for understanding brain development and disease mechanisms - and for discovering new drugs.

Although it starts as relatively simple tissue, the human brain swiftly develops into the most complex known natural structure, and scientists are largely in the dark about how that happens.

This makes it extremely difficult for researchers to gain an understanding of what might be going wrong in - and therefore how to treat - many common disorders of the brain such as depression, schizophrenia and autism.

GROWING STEM CELLS

To create their brain tissue, Juergen Knoblich and Madeline Lancaster at Austria's Institute of Molecular Biotechnology and fellow researchers at Britain's Edinburgh University Human Genetics Unit began with human stem cells and grew them with a special combination of nutrients designed to capitalize on the cells' innate ability to organize into complex organ structures.

They grew tissue called neuroectoderm - the layer of cells in the embryo from which all components of the brain and nervous system develop.

Fragments of this tissue were then embedded in a scaffold and put into a spinning bioreactor - a system that circulates oxygen and nutrients to allow them to grow into cerebral organoids.

After a month, the fragments had organized themselves into primitive structures that could be recognized as developing brain regions such as retina, choroid plexus and cerebral cortex, the researchers explained in a telephone briefing.

At two months, the organoids reached a maximum size of around 4 millimeters (0.16 inches), they said in a report of their study published in the journal Nature.

Although they were very small and still a long way from resembling anything like the detailed structure of a fully developed human brain, they did contain firing neurons and distinct types of neural tissue.

"This is one of the cases where size doesn't really matter," Knoblich told reporters.

"Our system is not optimized for generation of an entire brain and that was not at all our goal. Our major goal was to analyze the development of human brain (tissue) and generate a model system we can use to transfer knowledge from animal models to a human setting."

In an early sign of how such mini brains may be useful for studying disease in the future, Knoblich's team were able to use their organoids to model the development of microcephaly, a rare neurological condition in which patients develop an abnormally small head, and identify what causes it.

Both the research team and other experts acknowledged, however, that the work was a very long way from growing a fully-functioning human brain in a laboratory.

"The human brain is the most complex thing in the known universe and has a frighteningly elaborate number of connections and interactions, both between its numerous subdivisions and the body in general," said Dean Burnett, lecturer in psychiatry at Cardiff University.

"Saying you can replicate the workings of the brain with some tissue in a dish in the lab is like inventing the first abacus and saying you can use it to run the latest version of Microsoft Windows - there is a connection there, but we're a long way from that sort of application yet."

(Editing by Mark Trevelyan)"





Beautiful Little Girl babies HD Wallpaper




""





Wallpapers Galaxy Ace s5830 Wallpapers




""





samsung galaxy s4 front view Wallpapers




""





SNSD Seohyun I Got A Boy Individual Wallpapers




""





SNSD Seohyun I Got A Boy Individual Wallpapers




""





Saturn Moon Titan Sports Thick Icy Shell & Bizarre Interior




" The tough icy shell of Saturn's largest moon Titan is apparently far stronger than previously thought, researchers say.

These surprising new findings add to hints Titan possesses an extraordinarily bizarre interior, scientists added.

Past research suggested Titan has an ocean hidden under its outer icy shell 30 to 120 miles (50 to 200 kilometers) thick. Investigators aim to explore this underground ocean in the hopes of finding alien life on Titan, since virtually wherever there is water on Earth, there is life. [See more photos of Titan, Saturn's largest moon]

To learn more about Titan's icy shell, planetary scientist Doug Hemingway at the University of California, Santa Cruz, analyzed the Cassini probe's scans of Titan's gravity field. The strength of the gravitational pull any point on a surface exerts depends on the amount of mass underneath it. The stronger the pull, the more the mass.

The researchers then compared these gravity results with the structure of Titan's surface. They expected that regions of high elevation would have the strongest gravitational pull, since one might suppose they had extra matter underneath them. Conversely, they expected regions of low elevation would have the weakest gravitational pull.

What the investigators discovered shocked them. The regions of high elevation on Titan had the weakest gravitational pull.

"It was very surprising to see that," Hemingway told SPACE.com. "We assumed at first that we got things wrong, that we were seeing the data backwards, but after we ran out of options to make that finding go away, we came up with a model that explains these observations."

To explain these gravity anomalies, Hemingway said to imagine mountains on Titan having roots. "It's like how most of an iceberg actually lies submerged underwater," he said. "If that root is really big, bigger than normal, it would displace water underneath it."

Ice has a lower density than water — a chunk of ice weighs less than a similar volume of water. These high-elevation areas on Titan apparently have roots large enough to displace a lot of water under them, meaning they exert a weaker gravitational pull.

Ice is buoyant in water. "In order to essentially hold these big icebergs down and keep them from bobbing up, that means Titan's shell has to be extremely rigid," Hemingway said.

It remains uncertain what makes Titan's shell this rigid. The ice might possess cage-like molecules known as clathrates that could make it stiffer. Also, "if the ocean underneath the shell is colder than before thought, that could make the ice shell thicker and thus more rigid," Hemingway said.

This rigidity could mean Titan's shell is less geologically active than once thought. "If at least the top 40 kilometers (25 miles) is very stiff and cold and dead, if you want something like cryovolcanoes that erupt water instead of lava on Titan's surface, you have to be more creative about how that might happen," Hemingway said.

Their model also suggests Titan's shell has seen an extensive amount of erosion, with features carved more than 650 feet (200 meters) deep on it surface. "We now need different groups of people to figure out how so much material could get broken up and transported long distances across Titan's surface," Hemingway said.

One implication of these new findings relates to whether or not Titan's interior is separated into distinct layers. If researchers have underestimated Titan's gravity field, one might suspect its core is a giant blob of matter that is not made up of distinct layers as one would expect from such a large body. For instance, Earth is separated into a crust, mantle and core, and even large asteroids such as Vesta seem to have interiors divided into several layers.

"Maybe Titan is a mixture of ice and rock from the core nearly all the way out, and it's only in the last part near its surface that it's differentiated into ice and water," Hemingway said. "But we could be wrong there."

To help solve this mystery, "what we need is a Titan orbiter," Hemingway said. "That way we can have much better readings of Titan and learn more about its ice shell and its interior."

The scientists detailed their findings in the Aug. 29 issue of the journal Nature.

Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article on SPACE.com."





NASA Drops Chopper in Crash Test




" NASA researchers intentionally dropped a helicopter fuselage packed with 13 crash test dummies on Wednesday (Aug. 28) to collect data intended to improve aircraft safety.

Around 1:15 pm ET, the chopper body was hoisted 30 feet (9 meters) into the air by cables attached to a huge gantry at NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va. About 10 minutes later, the fuselage was dropped, and it slammed into the ground with a thud.

NASA officials said earlier week that the airframe would hit the ground at 30 mph (48 km/h). [Photos: NASA Conducts Crash Test of Chopper Body]

To monitor how the vehicle and the dummies handled the impact, the researchers had installed a suite of cameras and sensors inside and outside the helicopter, including an Xbox Kinect, a motion-sensing device used to play video games.


The test was supposed to mimic a survivable crash scenario, and the data collected will help researchers improve safety features like seat belts.

The airframe used in the test once belonged to a CH-46 Sea Knight used by the U.S. Marine Corps. One side of it was painted white with black polka dots, though not for aesthetic reasons. In pictures taken on the ground, those dots will act as data points so that the researchers can reconstruct the crash to see just how the chopper's body bent and broke when it hit the ground.

Though the crash is instantaneous, these tests can take years to plan. The researchers say they are planning a 2014 crash test of a similar helicopter outfitted with additional materials, such as composite airframe retrofits. The tests are being conducted under the NASA Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate's Fundamental Aeronautics Program Rotary Wing Project, which aims to improve the performance, safety and efficiency of rotorcraft.

Follow Megan Gannon on Twitter and Google+. Follow us @livescience, Facebook & Google+. Original article on LiveScience."





Hayden Panettiere Joins the Bang Brigade!




"Hayden Panettiere looks banging!

The "Nashville" star revealed a brand-new fringy — and much blonder — 'do for her Wednesday appearance on "Late Show With David Letterman."

The 24-year-old actress, who has yet to confirm rumors that she's engaged to her boxer boyfriend, Wladimir Klitschko, 37, paired her platinum blunt cut with a patterned red-and-blue mini dress and a bold red lip while posing outside the late night show's New York studio.

"My friend said to go look at myself in the mirror … guess ill hafta trust her opinion…," she tweeted Wednesday along with a peek-a-boo photo showing just her eyes and bangs.

Panettiere is just the latest celeb to try out Hollywood's ever-growing bang trend. While Zooey Deschanel may be the poster child, everyone from Kim Kardashian to Kerry Washington, Taylor Swift, Emma Stone, and Lea Michele have sported the eyebrow-skimming style.

What do you think of Panettiere's new look?"





Kamis, 29 Agustus 2013

Jessica Simpson Shows Off Son Ace Knute for the First Time




"Nearly two months after giving birth to son Ace Knute, Jessica Simpson is ready to share her baby boy with the world!

The 33-year-old, who welcomed the newest addition on June 30, is debuting her little one on the cover of Us Weekly, posing along with 15-month-old daughter Maxwell.

Jessica Simpson, Maxwell Johnson, and Ace Knute Johnson (UsWeekly)

The mommy-of-two, who has been engaged to fiancé Eric Johnson since November 2010, seems to be happier than ever, telling the mag, "With two kids, we have our hands full, but every day is a new adventure. … It's fun! I feel very at peace with being a mom."

But will the cute couple, who had back-to-back babies, add more to their beautiful brood anytime soon?

"Pregnancy is alot. It was hard to do two so close together," admits the fashion mogul mama. "I have this huge sense of accomplishment, and I feel in my heart that I'm done. But obviously, accidents do happen!"

Check out the video for details on Jessica's life as a mom, and be sure to tune in to "omg! Insider" on TV tonight for more on this story."





Jessica Simpson Shows Off Son Ace Knute for the First Time




"Nearly two months after giving birth to son Ace Knute, Jessica Simpson is ready to share her baby boy with the world!

The 33-year-old, who welcomed the newest addition on June 30, is debuting her little one on the cover of Us Weekly, posing along with 15-month-old daughter Maxwell.

Jessica Simpson, Maxwell Johnson, and Ace Knute Johnson (UsWeekly)

The mommy-of-two, who has been engaged to fiancé Eric Johnson since November 2010, seems to be happier than ever, telling the mag, "With two kids, we have our hands full, but every day is a new adventure. … It's fun! I feel very at peace with being a mom."

But will the cute couple, who had back-to-back babies, add more to their beautiful brood anytime soon?

"Pregnancy is alot. It was hard to do two so close together," admits the fashion mogul mama. "I have this huge sense of accomplishment, and I feel in my heart that I'm done. But obviously, accidents do happen!"

Check out the video for details on Jessica's life as a mom, and be sure to tune in to "omg! Insider" on TV tonight for more on this story."





Revellers pay for Spain's annual tomato fight




"Some 20,000 revellers pelted each other with 130 tonnes (286 pounds) of squashed tomatoes Wednesday in a rain-drenched annual Spanish food fight known as the Tomatina, but this year they had to pay to join the fun.

Defying sheets of rain and stormy skies, masses of tomato-stained people from around the world -- led by Australians, Japanese and Britons -- engaged in battle in the Plaza Mayor square of Bunol, eastern Spain.

Many wore shower caps under the rain and goggles to protect their eyes from the acidic juice of the tomatoes, which must be squashed before they are hurled at fellow participants. Some people dressed as tomatoes.

In driving rain, some people who had partied through the night were singing, clapping and still taking swigs of wine and sangria directly from the bottle.

"It is one of the most famous festivals in western Europe and it is safer than running with a bull," said 22-year-old Brad Fisher from Sydney, who came with a tour group of 700 people wearing a mustard-coloured shirt with a ketchup logo.

The Tomatina has significant advantages over Spain's Pamplona bull-running festival, he explained. "One hundred and thirty tonnes of tomatoes is a lot but it's still better than a 500-kilo bull."

This year, for the first time, participants are paying a minimum of 10 euros ($13). Prices go up to 750 euros to get up on one of the six trucks bringing in the tomatoes. Some 5,000 free tickets have been set aside for Bunol residents.

Organisers have cut the number of participants by half citing safety concerns, recruiting 180 safety officials, 50 private security, police, nine ambulances, and several medical helicopters.

Bunol Mayor Joaquin Masmano Palmer says the new fee helped organisers to control crowd numbers but he has also admitted that the food fight, which has cost 140,000 euros to stage this year, represents a heavy burden for a town with a debt of 4.1 million euros.

For the first time, a private company, SpainTastic, has been charged with selling entry tickets to the Tomatina, sparking concern that recession-hit Spain's town festivals may be on the path to privatisation.

Among the top ticket buyers were Australians with 19.2 percent of the total, Japanese with 17.9 percent, Britons with 11.2 percent, Spaniards with 7.8 percent and Americans with 7.5 percent. About 60 percent of the tickets went to people aged 18 to 35. The oldest was 82.

Tomatina T-shirts, caps and coffee mugs are on sale, too.

Japanese tourist Keiko Jinhouchi, 28, said she was spending a week in Barcelona with two friends from Tokyo and they decided to enter the fray.

"It's my first time in Spain, we're here for the day. Because it's fun," she said.

Fellow Japanese Kohei Onizaki, equipped with swimming goggles, had a tomato painted on one cheek and a Japanese flag on the other.

"There is a very famous TV show in Japan where a famous person joins this festival. It's a very famous festival," he explained.

Though the origins of the event are unclear, it is thought to have its roots in a food fight between children during a parade in the mid-1940s.

It has grown in size as international press coverage has brought more and more people to the festival.

After the fight, many of the revellers traditionally head to the local river to wash off the pulp. In this year's rain, that may not be necessary."





Rabu, 28 Agustus 2013

Lamar Surfaces, Khloé Puts on Ring … but Will That Hush Those Divorce Rumors?




"Call off the missing-persons-alert: Lamar Odom has returned home and is talking again with wife Khloé Kardashian.

Amid rampant reports that his five-year marriage is on the rocks, Lamar surfaced on Monday afternoon in the San Fernando Valley. It's the first time the NBA star has been seen since publicly last Wednesday.

Odom was photographed in a white SUV near the home he shares with Khloé, and was later seen driving into their gated community.

In a positive sign that the "Keeping Up With the Kardashians" twosome is trying to work things out, Lamar was photographed with his wedding ring on. X17online also spotted Khloé, who had ditched her band last week on a trip to the gym, sporting her ring on Monday afternoon post-workout.

The Kardashian family has been concerned about Lamar. Several sources close to the clan have confirmed to omg! that the basketballer, who played with the Los Angeles Clippers last season, was struggling with drug abuse. However, the insiders insisted that the family knew where Lamar was and that he was not missing as some reports had claimed.

Odom, 33, has acknowledged smoking pot in the past. Sources tell omg! that he has recently moved on to harder drugs.

TMZ, which first broke news of Odom's latest personal struggles, reported on Tuesday that Odom's worsening drug use affected his 2012 basketball season with the Dallas Mavericks. All indications are that Odom was clean during his past season with the Clippers but then fell back on bad habits once the season ended in June. Tabloid cover stories have also claimed that Lamar was cheating on Khloé, which they have both denied.

However, according to Us Weekly, Khloé, 29, had been hiding her marital problems from her family before things exploded last week.

Still, the couple is trying to put down reports of imminent divorce.

In a Tuesday story, E! News quoted a family source as saying, "They have never spoken to a divorce attorney.

"Right now the family is focused on getting Lamar better.""





What is 'Big Data,' anyway? Authors of a new book try to explain




""Big data" has become a really big buzz-phrase — tossed around in conversations about everything from business to surveillance; cited as a tool to improve driving, hiring, understanding dogs, and everything else; and, inevitably, dismissed as a bunch of hype.

But what exactly is big data, anyway? Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think by Viktor Mayer-Schönberger and Kenneth Cukier, offers an answer. Their book is a wide-ranging assessment of "the ability of society to harness information in novel ways to produce useful insights or goods and services of significant value." And while they acknowledge that the term itself has become amorphous, they frame their subject pretty clearly: "Big data refers to things one can do at a large scale that cannot be done at a smaller one, to extract new insights or create new forms of value, in ways that change markets, organizations, the relationship between citizens and governments, and more."

That (not to mention the book's subtitle) might sound a little hype-y, but Big Data is fairly even-handed: Early chapters explore the hope and potential around the way massive information sets are being created and mined, but later ones are clear about risks, pitfalls, and dangers. Mayer-Schönberger is Professor of Internet Governance and Regulation at the Oxford Internet Institute / Oxford University; Cukier is "data editor" for The Economist. Their book raised a few questions for me — so I asked the authors. Here's what they said.

I'd like to start toward the end: One of your later chapters examines "the dark side of big data," and among other things you note concerns about privacy and the possibility of using "big-data predictions" to in effect penalize people for behavior they seem likely to engage in, but haven't. You even mention the NSA at one point. So I wonder what you've made of the debate about more recent surveillance revelations related to the agency: There's a lot of focus on the collection of the data, for instance, but should we be talking about how it's analyzed?

Kenneth Cukier: The question draws an excellent distinction — one that's sadly missing from the debate. The disclosures have been mostly about the collection and not the use of the data. And when intelligence agencies explain how they work with the data, the method seems oddly old-school: targeted surveillance, not too different from the days of alligator-clips atop copper wires. Of course we're probably not told the whole story and they're actually running massive statistical regressions across all the data to hunt for patterns that they didn't know to look for in advance. That's what Facebook and LinkedIn data-scientists would do with it. But we haven't yet seen evidence that this is what the NSA is doing.

That said, the collection alone is troubling because it is happening with insufficient oversight. And the goal of intelligence is to prevent bad things from happening — it's about prediction. As we lay out in the book, this may be troubling when people are penalized for what they only have propensity to do, not for what they've done. So we have to be very careful using this ability, as it improves to the degree that it becomes more established.

You make a compelling case about the limitations of sampling (as opposed to more comprehensive big data approaches) and how we've come to accept it perhaps more than we should. But among the examples you mention is voter intent. It's not like there's a comprehensive database of who everyone intends to vote for, is there? How does big data actually provide an alternative here? Isn't there a distinction between what we want to measure and what we can measure?

Cukier: Actually, there is a database of every voter and their intentions. Both major parties contract with different data providers that are loosely affiliated with the parties, to tap databases of all Americans. The first variable is if the person is registered to vote and if he or she actually cast a ballot in the most recent election. The Democrats in 2012 had an internal database of every voter in America and asked three questions of it: Do you support Obama; are you likely to vote; and if you are undecided, are you persuadable? By ranking people based on that last measure, the Dems could know where to best spend their advertising budget for maximum impact.

Big data was critical: sampling works well for basic questions like what candidate a person supports. But it's less useful when you want to drill down into the granular — like what candidate Asian-American women with college degrees support. To do that, you may need to give up your sample and go for it all.

Yet the broader point is correct: there is a difference between what we want to measure and what we can measure. And we need to be on guard that we don't confuse the two. For example, in the Vietnam War, the Pentagon used the metric of the body count as a way to measure progress, when that data wasn't really meaningful to what they wanted to depict. Sadly, I fret this fallibility is something that we'll just have to learn to live with, as we have in so many other domains.

Many of your examples involve scrutinizing data that already exists (including instances where it's mined for reasons that have nothing to do with why it was gathered), but I was very interested to learn about "datafication" that involves setting out to collect new information in new ways: For instance, UPS "datifying" its vehicle fleet by gathering mechanical information that predicts and minimizes breakdowns. This almost seem like a distinct category to me. Do you think of it as a fundamentally different form of big data?

Viktor Mayer-Schönberger: It is tempting to be dazzled by the many new types of data that are being collected — from engine sensors in UPS vehicles, to heart rates in

premature babies, to human posture. But that is how datafication works in practice: at first we think it is impossible to render something in data form, then somebody comes up with a nifty and cost-efficient idea to do so, and we are amazed by the applications that this will enable, and then we come to accept it as the new normal. A few years ago, this happened with geo-location data, and before it was with web browsing data (gleaned through cookies). It is a sign of the continuing progress of datafication.

You're right that dataficiation is fundamentally different than big data. For example, the 19th century American navigator Commodore Maury, who invented tidal maps, datafied the logbooks of past sea voyages by extracting information about the wind and waves at a given location. But we can get the most of big data today because so many new elements of our lives are being rendered into a data form, which was extremely hard to do in the past.

You emphasize that making the most of big data means we have to "shed some of [our] obsession for causality in exchange for simple correlations: not knowing why but only what." This means breaking from the tradition of coming up with a hypothesis and testing it: It doesn't matter whether we can explain a correlation that big data reveals, we should just act on it. That's a big shift! I'm curious if when you're out talking about the book whether you get a lot of resistance to that idea, because it seems crucial to what you call the "big data mindset."

Mayer-Schönberger: Yes, we do encounter resistance on this point, but intriguingly, it's rarely from the real experts in their field. They often know how tentative their causal conclusions are, or how much they are actually based on correlations rather than truly comprehending the exact causality of things. Also, we often get mischaracterized as either suggesting that theories don't matter or causality is not important. We don't argue either. In fact, theories will continue to matter very much, but the concrete hypothesis derived from a theory less so.

Take Google Flu Trends. The theory that what people search for could correlate with human health in a given location was crucial for Google Flu Trends to happen. But none of Google's engineers could ever have guessed the exact hypothesis to test — that is, the exact search terms that best predict the spread of the flu. After all, the company handles around 3 billion searches every day. So big data analysis did that for them.

Causal connections are really valuable where and if one can find them. But looking for them at great cost and coming up empty is less useful, we suggest, than looking for correlations — not least because such correlations can help identify what potential connections between two phenomena should be investigated for a possible causal link. In that very sense, big data analysis actually helps causal investigations as well.

Finally, I was struck by how many examples in the book involved businesses that have amassed incredible data sets and learned to use them to boost sales or improve marketing. You have the story of how Wal Mart mined its past data and figured out that people preparing for a hurricane by purchasing flashlights and the like also tended to buy Pop-Tarts — so it put Pop-Tarts at the front of the store during hurricane season, and sales increased. Is there any concern about how much big data is in effect owned by business, and deployed largely in the service of the profit motive? I think one thing that makes people nervous about the big data idea is that it's so often opaque. But do the benefits outweigh those concerns? Should we stop worrying and just be thankful for the conveniently placed Pop-Tarts?

Mayer-Schönberger: There is a value in having conveniently placed Pop-Tarts, and it isn't just that Wal Mart is making more money. It is also that shoppers find faster what they are likely looking for. Sometimes big data gets badly mischaracterized as just a tool to create more targeted advertising online. But UPS uses big data to save millions of gallons of fuel — and thus improve both its bottom line and the environment. Google aiding public health agencies in predicting the spread of the flu, or Decide.com helping consumers save a bundle has nothing to do with targeted advertising, and create positive effects beyond a single company's quarterly profit. We need to cast our gaze wider when we want to understand big data's upside (and incidentally, also its "dark sides").

My thanks to Mayer-Schönberger and Cukier for taking the time to answer these questions. Their book is: Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. "





Justin Timberlake Defends Miley Cyrus' VMAs Performance: "It's Not Like She Did It at the Grammys"




"Much ado about nothing? Justin Timberlake thinks so. Fans and fellow celebs can't stop talking about Miley Cyrus' raunchy VMAs performance with "Blurred Lines" singer Robin Thicke, but Timberlake, for one, says the uproar is uncalled for.

"Listen, man, you know, it's the VMAs. What did you guys expect?" the "Suit & Tie" singer, 32, told Fresh 102.7 radio host Jim Douglas on Tuesday, Aug. 27, two days after the show. "I like Miley. I like her a lot. I think, you know, she's young. She's letting everybody know that she's growing up." (Timberlake can relate. He's a former Disney star himself.)

The singer also pointed out that the VMAs have historically been the one awards show where pretty much anything goes. "I just think it's the VMAs. It's not like she did it at the Grammys," he said. "Let her do her thing, you know?"

He then went on to note several other "scandalous" moments in the show's past, including one involving ex-girlfriend Britney Spears, another Disney alum. "Madonna: wedding suit, humping the stage. Britney: strip tease. This is not an uncommon thing," he said. "I actually thought all the bears were really cool." (Cyrus' now-infamous performance featured her twerking with giant teddy bears, a nod to her music video for "We Can't Stop.")

The 'N Sync alum -- who reunited with his former bandmates at the VMAs before accepting the Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award -- said the best part of the whole spectacle, though, was the audience. "My favorite part of the Miley Cyrus performance is the Smith family reaction," he joked, referring to a viral picture of Will Smith and kids Willow and Jaden looking aghast while watching the action onstage. (In fact, the funny snapshot was part of a widespread mixup; the trio were actually reacting to Lady Gaga's performance, not Cyrus'.)

"I was late to the game on that," the star said of the photo. "I was just shown that this morning, so it's fresh in my mind."

Incidentally, Timberlake isn't the only one coming to Cyrus' defense. The 20-year-old "We Can't Stop" singer's dad, Billy Ray Cyrus, also spoke out on Aug. 27, telling Entertainment Tonight that he'll "always be here" for her. "She's still my little girl, and I'm still her dad, regardless of how this circus we call show business plays out," he said. "I love her unconditionally and that will never change."

This article originally appeared on Usmagazine.com: Justin Timberlake Defends Miley Cyrus' VMAs Performance: "It's Not Like She Did It at the Grammys""





okedaichi.blogspot.com

okedaichi.blogspot.com


Exclusive…’Crazy, Absurd!’ Go Behind the Scenes of Avril Lavigne’s ‘Rock N Roll’ Video!

Posted: 27 Aug 2013 12:28 PM PDT




"If you haven't already seen Avril Lavigne's video for "Rock 'N' Roll," just be forewarned that the clip basically defies a cohesive description. Between the pop singer's warrior-military garb, the car driven by a dog, the famous guest stars (including a smooch with "Wonder Years" actress Danica McKellar!), the blade-adorned guitar...oh yeah, and the bearshark...this is one heck of a sensational visual journey.

In fact, as the director of the clip himself puts it, it's crazy, absurd, and badass, which is just the way rock 'n' roll should be, right? Yahoo! Music is excited to present this exclusive behind-the-scenes video detailing the making of this opus, with more director's commentary, as well as Lavigne herself weighing in on the action.

Meet the dog! See Sid from Slipknot chuck a baby doll! Get the inside scoop and a closeup on that kiss with "Winnie!" Watch the bearshark twerk! (Well, okay, maybe that's taking it a bit far, but he does do a little dance. ) It's all here."





Minggu, 25 Agustus 2013

Tyra Banks (Celeb Style Snafus)









Ciara (2 Hot 2 Handle)









By the Numbers: Ben Affleck and the Batmen




"With the news that Ben Affleck is to join that Batranks, that makes six men in modern times who have donned the pointed hood to play Batman on the big screen. Big Ben joins Adam West, Michael Keaton, Val Kilmer, George Clooney, Christian Bale in the hallowed ranks.

Opinions vary on whether Affleck is a good choice for the role, but how do they stack up as a group? We ran the numbers to find out.

"





okedaichi.blogspot.com

okedaichi.blogspot.com


Celeb Workout Buddies

Posted: 24 Aug 2013 06:51 AM PDT













Jumat, 23 Agustus 2013

Nasdaq trading halts for 3 hours due to glitch




"NEW YORK (AP) — A mysterious technical glitch halted trading on the Nasdaq for three hours Thursday in the latest major electronic breakdown on Wall Street, embarrassing the stock exchange that hosts the biggest names in technology, including Apple, Microsoft and Google.

The problem sent brokers racing to figure out what went wrong and raised new questions about the pitfalls of the electronic trading systems that have come to dominate the nation's stock markets.

Nasdaq said only that the problem lay in its system for disseminating prices. An investigation was underway.

The outage disrupted what had otherwise been a quiet summer day on Wall Street. It was another in a series of technical problems to disrupt financial markets, though less alarming than the "flash crash" that set off a stock-market plunge in May 2010.

"The market has gotten quite complex and needlessly so," said Sal Arnuk, co-founder of the brokerage Themis Trading.

The Nasdaq, a stock exchange dominated by some of the largest, most prosperous technology companies, sent out an alert shortly after noon that said it would stop trading. The Nasdaq composite index spent much of the afternoon stuck at 3,631.17.

Trading resumed at 3:25 p.m. Thirty-five minutes later, the day ended day with the index up 38 points, or 1 percent, at 3,638.71.

Investors are not at risk of losing any money from these glitches unless they are unlucky enough to be buying or selling a stock at the exact moment when an error occurs, forcing them to cancel their trades.

"Clearly it's an annoyance, but it doesn't in any way affect the value of your underlying assets," said Marty Leclerc at Barrack Yard, chief investment officer at Barrack Yard Advisors, an investment adviser. "Warren Buffet used to say that if you own a stock you ought to be comfortable with it even if the market were to close for a year."

During the outage, the Nasdaq said it wouldn't cancel any orders stuck in limbo, but that customers were free to cancel their orders before trading resumed.

The shutdown did not upset other parts of the stock market. But one stock that did take a hit was the parent company of the exchange, Nasdaq OMX, which fell $1.08, or 3.4 percent, to close at $30.46 in heavy trading.

The White House, the Treasury Department and other government agencies said they would monitor the disruption.

Brad McMillan, chief investment officer of the independent brokerage Commonwealth Financial, said competition between rival exchanges for customers was partly to blame. The exchanges try to bring in more business with the promise of faster trading, which makes them more reliant on new technology.

"The more trading is tied to technology, the more computer crashes matter," McMillan said.

He said he was not overly concerned about Thursday's disruption, recalling a day in August 1994 when a mischievous squirrel caused a brief closure of Nasdaq by chewing into power lines near the stock market's computer center in Trumbull, Conn.

The shutdown was another sign that the days of stock brokers in colorful jackets roaming the floor of the stock exchange have faded away. Now powerful computer programs dominate trading by sifting through reams of data and executing trades in fractions of a second. That makes trading faster and, arguably, more efficient. But it also introduces more possibilities for errors that can jolt the entire market.

Last year, BATS Global Markets tried to go public on its own exchange but had to back out after a computer error sent the stock price plunging to just pennies. Facebook's public offering last spring was also error-riddled, as technical problems kept many investors from knowing if their trades had gone through and left some holding unwanted shares. And in April, the Chicago Board Options Exchange shut down for a morning because of a software problem.

Then there was the 2010 "flash crash" in which the Dow Jones industrial average fell hundreds of points in minutes before eventually closing 348 points lower. It was one of the first major blips that brought the potential dangers of computerized trading into the public sphere.

One of the lessons from the flash crash was that it's better to stop trading and re-open a market in a fair and orderly manner than to have messy trading, said James Angel, a finance professor at Georgetown University who specializes in the structure and regulation of financial markets.

"I think people are so used to the fact that every once in a while the power goes out and a computer crashes," Angel said. "As long as the trading is fair and orderly I don't think that's going to deter people from investing."

Trading glitches can also change fortunes. A technical bug spelled the end for Knight Capital as a stand-alone company and marred its long-standing reputation as a stellar risk manager after the problem sent stocks of dozens of companies swinging wildly on Aug. 1 of last year.

It also left Knight, which takes orders from big brokers like TD Ameritrade and E-Trade, on the hook for many of the stocks that its computers accidentally ordered. Knight teetered near bankruptcy and this summer was taken over by the high-speed trading firm Getco.

___

AP Business Writers Christina Rexrode, Steve Rothwell, Marcy Gordon and contributed."





okedaichi.blogspot.com

okedaichi.blogspot.com


Exclusive ‘Star Trek Into Darkness’ Clip and Concept Art Beam In Digital Release

Posted: 22 Aug 2013 08:08 AM PDT




"One of the summer's biggest hits is coming home a little early as "Star Trek Into Darkness" has been released for your downloading pleasure on digital platforms today, three weeks before the film hits Blu-ray and DVD on September 10. Get ready to beam aboard the Enterprise from the comfort of your own personal digital platforms with our exclusive clip above, which offers a behind-the-scenes look at the opening scene featuring Kirk (Chris Pine) and Bones (Karl Urban) running from the natives of the planet Nibiru. What's most remarkable about the clip is it showcases the practical effects utilized in bringing the location to life — not only was a set built in favor of a CGI landscape, the environment was actually outdoors as well."